This chart reveals how far NATO allies must hike to get to five% of GDP
U.S. President Donald Trump attends a gathering with NATO Secretary Common Jens Stoltenberg forward of the NATO summit in Watford, in London, Britain, December 3, 2019.
Kevin Lamarque | Reuters
Earlier than this week’s annual NATO summit had even begun, allies reportedly agreed on Sunday to hike their protection spending to five% of gross home product (GDP) by 2035. Attending to that concentrate on, nonetheless is one other matter.
The 5% determine is made up of three.5% of GDP that needs to be spent on “pure” protection, with an additional 1.5% of GDP going to security-related infrastructure, similar to cyber warfare capabilities and intelligence.
The Western navy alliance’s transfer on Sunday — when NATO ambassadors reportedly agreed in precept on a compromise textual content on the spending rise — confirmed member states had been able to acquiesce, a minimum of publicly, to Washington’s calls for for allies to tug their weight in relation to protection and safety.
However one chart, based mostly on NATO estimates for members’ protection spending in 2024, reveals what a tall order a 5% goal will probably be for the 32 member states, with some struggling to even meet the 2014 pact to spend of two% of GDP on protection.
Pushback
Protection spending has lengthy been a thorny topic for NATO members, and a persistent supply of irritation for U.S. President Donald Trump, who was demanding that allies double their spending targets from 2% to 4% of GDP all the way in which again in 2018.
NATO protection expenditure has nonetheless sharply picked up amongst NATO members since Trump was final in energy.
Again then, and arguably on the top of the White Home chief’s irritation with the bloc, solely six member states met the two% goal, together with the U.S. Instances have modified, nonetheless; by 2024, 23 members had reached the two% threshold, in keeping with NATO knowledge.
Whereas some significantly surpassed that concentrate on — similar to Poland, Estonia, the U.S., Latvia and Greece — main economies together with Canada, Spain and Italy have lagged beneath the contribution threshold.
No NATO member has to date reached the 5% spending goal, and a few are extremely more likely to drag their toes in relation to attending to that milestone now.
Spain has already pushed in opposition to the spending hike with Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez saying Madrid wouldn’t have to fulfill the 5% goal as it will solely should spend 2.1% of GDP to fulfill NATO’s core navy necessities, Reuters reported.
“We absolutely respect the official need of different nations to extend their protection funding, however we’re not going to take action,” Sanchez mentioned in an deal with on Spanish tv, in keeping with the information company. Sanchez was reported final week to have referred to as the hike, not solely “unreasonable but in addition counterproductive.”

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and U.S. President Donald Trump shake palms throughout a joint press convention within the East Room on the White Home, Feb. 27, 2025 in Washington, D.C., U.S.
Carl Courtroom | By way of Reuters
Even nations which can be towing the road on the 5% goal, like Germany and the U.Ok., which each say they’re in favor of the hike, may wrestle to achieve it, given financial pressures at residence. Britain has reportedly requested a 3-year delay to the hike. CNBC requested the British authorities for remark however has but to obtain a reply.
Different nations are forward of the sport in relation to the hike. Poland, on the japanese flank of the alliance and nervous of Russia’s ongoing battle in neighboring Ukraine, says it is already on monitor to spend 5% of GDP on protection quickly.

In the meantime, Estonia, which additionally shares a border with Russia, has permitted a protection funding program that is anticipated to lift its annual protection funds to a median of 5.4% of GDP from 2026 to 2029.
The uneven geographical distribution of navy spending will increase throughout European states may nonetheless trigger friction at this week’s summit, Carsten Nickel, deputy director of analysis in danger consultancy Teneo mentioned in emailed feedback Monday.
“But, higher protection spending will in any case deal with solely a part of a deeper problem to the transatlantic relationship,” he famous, with frictions over navy burden-sharing, commerce deficits, and China coverage additionally threatening relations between allies.
— CNBC’s Ganesh Rao and April Roach contributed to this story.