Lawyer discusses wrongful demise lawsuit that lists eating places believed to have served driver in DUI crash
DECATUR, Ala. (WHNT) — The household of Chloe Hastings, a 17-year-old lady who was tragically killed in a fiery automobile crash in Decatur, is taking authorized motion.
On Tuesday, the household filed a wrongful demise lawsuit in opposition to Kevin Penich, the person charged with DUI and homicide within the crash, and the institutions that they imagine served him alcohol that night time.
Wrongful demise lawsuit filed in opposition to man charged with homicide in Beltline Highway crash, Decatur companies
In keeping with Decatur Police, the crash occurred on Might 17 on the intersection of Beltline Highway and Westmead Avenue.
Information 19 spoke with the lawyer representing the Hastings household within the lawsuit. Lawyer Hunter Garnett stated the aim is to make sure no different household has to undergo what the Hastings household has gone by way of.
“The aim on this case is to guarantee that there’s not one other Chloe Hastings,” Garnett stated. “That there are not any extra youngsters killed, because of the reckless conduct of drunk drivers, resulting from being overserved at a bar.”
“We imagine that the proof will present that Kevin Penich was intoxicated when he went into these institutions or turned intoxicated because of being served alcohol,” Garnett stated.
Wrongful demise lawsuit filed in opposition to man charged with homicide in Beltline Highway crash, Decatur companies
The lawsuit claims Penich was served alcohol at three Decatur eating places situated off of Beltline Highway: Buffalo Wild Wings, Logan’s Roadhouse, and Alfonso’s Pizza.
“Our aim is to carry anyone that contributed to the hurt accountable,” Garnett informed Information 19. “These are massive institutions that ought to know higher than to serve any person to the purpose of being this degree of intoxicated.”
The lawsuit cites the Alabama Dram Store Act:
“The spouse, little one, mum or dad, or different one who shall be injured in individual, property or technique of help by any intoxicated individual or in consequence of the intoxication of any individual shall have a proper of motion in opposition to any individual, who shall, by promoting, giving, or in any other case disposing of to a different, opposite to the provisions of regulation, any liquors or drinks, trigger the intoxication of such individual for all damages truly sustained in addition to exemplary damages.”
It basically claims that an individual who’s injured by somebody who’s intoxicated has the correct to take motion in opposition to the one who precipitated the individual to be intoxicated.
The lawsuit additionally cites a bit of the Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Management Board Guidelines and Laws that reads, “no licensee or worker of a licensee shall serve or dispense alcoholic drinks to any individual visibly intoxicated.”
Garnett informed Information 19 that it’s the duty of an individual serving alcohol to take action responsibly.
“In case you’re a bartender, for those who’re a waitress, for those who’re anyone that serves alcohol, I need to stress that it’s your job to guarantee that when you have got a patron that you simply don’t overserve them,” Garnett stated.
He stated that the household is in search of punitive damages within the lawsuit.
He additionally defined that the wrongful demise lawsuit will probably take a again seat whereas the felony case in opposition to Kevin Penich strikes by way of the courtroom system.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This materials will not be printed, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
For the most recent information, climate, sports activities, and streaming video, head to WHNT.com.