Enhancing Oversight of Federal Grantmaking – The White Home
By the authority vested in me as President by the Structure and the legal guidelines of the US of America, and to enhance the method of Federal grantmaking whereas ending offensive waste of tax {dollars}, it’s hereby ordered:
Part 1. Objective. Each tax greenback the Authorities spends ought to enhance American lives or advance American pursuits. This usually doesn’t occur. Federal grants have funded drag exhibits in Ecuador, educated doctoral candidates in important race concept, and developed transgender-sexual-education packages. In 2024, one research claimed that greater than one-quarter of latest Nationwide Science Basis (NSF) grants went to range, fairness, and inclusion and different far-left initiatives. These NSF grants included these to educators that promoted Marxism, class warfare propaganda, and different anti-American ideologies within the classroom, masked as rigorous and considerate investigation.
The hurt imposed by problematic Federal grants doesn’t cease at propagating absurd ideologies. An unsafe lab in Wuhan, China — seemingly the supply of the COVID-19 pandemic — engaged in gain-of-function analysis funded by the Nationwide Institutes of Well being. The NSF gave thousands and thousands to develop AI-powered social media censorship instruments — a direct assault on free speech. Taxpayer-funded grants have additionally gone to non-governmental organizations that offered free providers to unlawful immigrants, worsening the border disaster and compromising our security, and to organizations that actively labored towards American pursuits overseas.
Even for tasks receiving Federal funds that serve an ostensibly helpful function, the Authorities has paid inadequate consideration to their efficacy. For instance, a major proportion of the outcomes of federally funded scientific analysis tasks can’t be reproduced by exterior researchers. Even at Harvard and Stanford, as soon as thought of amongst America’s most prestigious universities, senior researchers have resigned following accusations of knowledge falsification. A considerable portion of many Federal grants for university-led analysis goes to not scientific venture candidates or groundbreaking analysis, however to school amenities and administrative prices.
The grant assessment course of itself additionally undermines the pursuits of American taxpayers. Writing efficient grant functions is notoriously advanced, and grant candidates that may afford authorized and technical consultants usually tend to obtain funds — which may then additional assist these non-mission capabilities. As well as, there may be inadequate interagency coordination and assessment by related subject material consultants to scale back duplication. Because of this, the very best proposals don’t at all times obtain funding, and there may be an excessive amount of unfocused analysis of marginal social utility.
Briefly, there’s a sturdy have to strengthen oversight and coordination of, and to streamline, company grantmaking to handle these issues, forestall them from recurring, and guarantee higher accountability to be used of public funds extra broadly. The Authorities holds tax income in belief for the American folks, and companies ought to deal with it accordingly.
Sec. 2. Definitions. For functions of this order:
(b) The time period “company head” means the highest-ranking official or officers of an company, such because the Secretary, Administrator, Chairman, Director, Commissioners, or Board of Administrators, except in any other case specified on this order.
(c) The time period “Director” means the Director of the Workplace of Administration and Finances (OMB).
(d) The time period “discretionary award” or “discretionary grant” means a grant that may be a “discretionary award” as that time period is outlined in 2 CFR 200.1. It doesn’t embrace packages the place laws establishes an entitlement to the funds on the a part of the recipient, resembling block grants; these awarded based mostly on a statutory formulation; or catastrophe restoration grants.
(e) The time period “funding alternative announcement” means a “discover of funding alternative” as outlined in 2 CFR 200.1, because it pertains to a discretionary award.
(f) The time period “grant” means any “grant settlement or grant” as outlined in 2 CFR 200.1, “cooperative settlement” as outlined in 2 CFR 200.1, or related award of economic help, together with overseas help awards.
(g) The time period “regulation” means an company assertion of normal or specific applicability and future impact designed to implement, interpret, or prescribe legislation or coverage or describing the process or follow necessities of an company, together with, with out limitation, rules, interpretative guidelines, and statements of coverage.
(h) The time period “senior appointee” means a person appointed by the President, a non-career member of the Senior Government Service, or an worker encumbering a Senior Degree, Scientific and Skilled, or Grade 15 place in Schedule C of the excepted service.
Sec. 3. Strengthening Accountability for Company Grantmaking. (a) Every company head shall promptly designate a senior appointee who shall be answerable for making a course of to assessment new funding alternative bulletins and to assessment discretionary grants to make sure that they’re per company priorities and the nationwide curiosity. For the avoidance of doubt, this course of shall not assure any specific degree of assessment or consideration to funding candidates besides as per relevant legislation. As per relevant legislation, this assessment course of shall incorporate, at a minimal:
(i) assessment and approval of company funding alternative bulletins by a number of senior appointees or their designees;
(ii) continuation of present coordination with OMB;
(iii) to the extent applicable to the subject material of the bulletins, assessment by designated subject-matter consultants as recognized by the company head or the company head’s designee;
(iv) assessment of funding alternative bulletins and associated types to make sure that they embrace solely such necessities as are essential for an sufficient analysis of the appliance and are written in plain language with a objective of minimizing the necessity for authorized or technical experience in drafting an utility;
(v) interagency coordination to find out whether or not the subject material of a selected funding alternative announcement has already been addressed by one other company announcement and, if that’s the case, whether or not one of many bulletins ought to be modified or withdrawn to advertise consistency and remove redundancy;
(vi) for scientific analysis discretionary grants, assessment by not less than one subject material skilled within the area of the appliance, who could also be a member of the grant assessment panel, this system officer, or an outdoor skilled; and
(vii) pre-issuance assessment of discretionary awards to make sure that the awards are per relevant legislation, company priorities, and the nationwide curiosity, which shall contain in-person or digital dialogue of functions by grant assessment panels or program workplaces with a senior appointee or that appointee’s designee.
(b) Company heads shall designate a number of senior appointees to assessment discretionary awards on an annual foundation for consistency with company priorities and substantial progress. Such assessment shall embrace an accountability mechanism for officers answerable for choice and granting of the awards.
(c) Till such time as the method laid out in subsection (a) of this part is in place, companies shall not subject any new funding alternative bulletins with out prior approval from the senior appointee designated below subsection (a) of this part, besides as required by legislation.
Sec. 4. Issues for Discretionary Awards. (a) Senior appointees and their designees shall not ministerially ratify or routinely defer to the suggestions of others in reviewing funding alternative bulletins or discretionary awards, however shall as an alternative use their impartial judgment.
(b) In reviewing and approving funding alternative bulletins and discretionary awards, in addition to in designing the assessment course of described in part 3(a) of this order, senior appointees and their designees shall, as related and to the extent per relevant legislation, apply the next ideas, together with in any scoring rubrics used to evaluate grant proposals:
(i) Discretionary awards should, the place relevant, demonstrably advance the President’s coverage priorities.
(ii) Discretionary awards shall not be used to fund, promote, encourage, subsidize, or facilitate:
(A) racial preferences or different types of racial discrimination by the grant recipient, together with actions the place race or intentional proxies for race will probably be used as a range criterion for employment or program participation;
(B) denial by the grant recipient of the intercourse binary in people or the notion that intercourse is a selected or mutable attribute;
(C) unlawful immigration; or
(D) every other initiatives that compromise public security or promote anti-American values.
(iii) All else being equal, desire for discretionary awards ought to be given to establishments with decrease oblique value charges.
(iv) Discretionary grants ought to be given to a broad vary of recipients relatively than to a choose group of repeat gamers. Analysis grants ought to be awarded to a mixture of recipients more likely to produce instantly demonstrable outcomes and recipients with the potential for doubtlessly longer-term, breakthrough outcomes, in a way per the funding alternative announcement.
(v) Candidates ought to decide to complying with administration insurance policies, procedures, and steerage respecting Gold Commonplace Science.
(vi) Discretionary awards ought to embrace clear benchmarks for measuring success and progress in direction of related targets and, as related for awards pertaining to scientific analysis, a dedication to reaching Gold Commonplace Science.
(vii) To the extent institutional affiliation is taken into account in making discretionary awards, companies ought to prioritize an establishment’s dedication to rigorous, reproducible scholarship over its historic repute or perceived status. As to science grants, companies ought to prioritize establishments which have demonstrated success in implementing Gold Commonplace Science.
(c) Nothing on this order shall be construed to discourage or forestall using peer assessment strategies to guage proposals for discretionary awards or in any other case inform company determination making, offered that peer assessment suggestions stay advisory and will not be ministerially ratified, routinely deferred to, or in any other case handled as de facto binding by senior appointees or their designees. Additional, nothing on this order shall be construed to create any rights to any specific degree of assessment or consideration for any funding applicant besides as per relevant legislation.
Sec. 5. Revisions to the Uniform Steering. (a) The Director shall revise the Uniform Steering and different related steerage to streamline utility necessities and to additional make clear and require all discretionary grants to allow termination for comfort, together with when the award not advances company priorities or the nationwide curiosity, however topic to applicable exceptions, together with agreements entered into in furtherance of worldwide commerce agreements or these awarded by the Division of Commerce below title XCIX of the William M. (Mac) Thornberry Nationwide Protection Authorization Act for Fiscal 12 months 2021 (Public Regulation 116-283), the CHIPS Act of 2022 (Public Regulation 117-167), or division F of the Infrastructure Funding and Jobs Act (Public Regulation 117-58).
(b) The Director shall additional revise the Uniform Steering and different related steerage to appropriately restrict using discretionary grant funds for prices associated to amenities and administration.
Sec. 6. Implementation and Termination Clauses. (a) Inside 30 days of the date of this order, every company head shall assessment the company’s customary grant phrases and circumstances and submit a report back to the Director detailing:
(i) whether or not the company’s customary phrases and circumstances for discretionary awards allow termination for comfort and embrace the termination provisions described in 2 CFR 200.340(a), together with the provisions that an award could also be terminated by the company “if an award not effectuates this system targets or company priorities” or, within the case of a partial termination by the recipient, if the company “determines that the remaining portion of the Federal award won’t accomplish the needs for which the Federal award was made”;
(ii) whether or not the company’s customary phrases and circumstances for discretionary overseas help awards allow termination based mostly on the nationwide curiosity; and
(iii) the approximate variety of energetic discretionary awards on the company, in addition to the approximate share of funding obligated below these awards that incorporates termination provisions permitting for termination below the circumstances described in subsection (i) of this part.
(b) Every company head shall, to the utmost extent permitted by legislation and per related Government Orders or different Presidential directives, take steps to revise the phrases and circumstances of present discretionary grants to allow fast termination for comfort, or make clear that such termination is permitted, together with if the award not advances company priorities or the nationwide curiosity. Every company head shall make sure that such phrases are included in all future discretionary grants and likewise shall take steps to revise all relevant rules binding on or integrated in discretionary grant phrases and circumstances to require such phrases. Company heads shall take motion to include these new phrases and circumstances into all future amendments to grant awards.
(c) To the extent practicable and per relevant legislation, company heads shall insert in future discretionary grant agreements phrases and circumstances that:
(i) prohibit recipients from instantly drawing down normal grant funds for particular tasks with out the affirmative authorization of the company; and
(ii) require grantees to supply written explanations or assist, with specificity, for requests for every drawdown.
Sec. 7. Common Provisions. (a) Nothing on this order shall be construed to impair or in any other case have an effect on:
(i) the authority granted by legislation to an govt division or company, or the pinnacle thereof; or
(ii) the capabilities of the Director of the Workplace of Administration and Finances referring to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be carried out per relevant legislation and topic to the supply of appropriations.
(c) This order is just not supposed to, and doesn’t, create any proper or profit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at legislation or in fairness by any celebration towards the US, its departments, companies, or entities, its officers, workers, or brokers, or every other particular person.
(d) If any provision of this order, or the appliance of any provision to any particular person or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the rest of this order and the appliance of its provisions to every other individuals or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
(e) The prices for publication of this order shall be borne by the Workplace of Administration and Finances.
DONALD J. TRUMP
THE WHITE HOUSE,
August 7, 2025.