World News

Trump pushes again after leaked report suggests Iran strikes had restricted affect

Leaked harm evaluation of US strike on Iran was ‘inconclusive’ – Trump

Donald Trump and his prime officers have pushed again on a leaked intelligence report that mentioned US strikes on Iran solely set its nuclear programme again by just a few months.

Talking at a Nato summit in The Hague on Wednesday, Trump mentioned the strikes led to the “digital obliteration” of Iran’s nuclear capabilities and set its atomic programme again “by a long time”.

Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who was additionally on the summit, mentioned the preliminary Pentagon evaluation was made with “low confidence” and the FBI was investigating the leak.

On Tuesday, sources aware of the preliminary report into Saturday’s bombings informed the BBC’s US companion CBS that Iran’s stockpile of enriched uranium was not eradicated.

They added that the strikes had solely set the nation’s nuclear programme again by just a few months – an evaluation the White Home swiftly described as “flat-out flawed”.

In response to the report, strikes on the closely fortified enrichment amenities at Fordo and Natanz had sealed off entrances however didn’t destroy underground constructions.

Officers aware of the leaked Protection Intelligence Company analysis warned it was an early evaluation that would change as extra info turns into obtainable concerning the websites.

The Protection Intelligence Company is the Pentagon’s personal company which specialises in navy intelligence to assist operations. It collects massive quantities of technical intelligence, however is distinct from different companies just like the CIA.

The US has 18 intelligence companies, which generally produce conflicting reviews based mostly on their mission and space of experience. For instance, the American intelligence neighborhood continues to be not in settlement over the origins of Covid-19.

On Wednesday, whereas sitting alongside Nato Chief Mark Rutte, Trump initially acknowledged some uncertainty, saying the intelligence on the assault was “very inconclusive”.

However he then went additional in his evaluation, saying “it was very extreme, it was [an] obliteration”.

When requested if the US would strike once more ought to Iran resume its nuclear actions, Trump mentioned: “Certain, however I am not going to have to fret about that. It is gone for years.”

Trump later likened the strikes to America’s atomic bombing of Hiroshima on the finish of World Conflict Two.

“I do not need to use an instance of Hiroshima, I do not need to use an instance of Nagasaki, however that was basically the identical factor – that ended a struggle,” he mentioned.

The US president was flanked by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, who each echoed his scepticism concerning the leaked intelligence.

Hegseth mentioned the leak was politically motivated and insisted the bombs landed “exactly the place they had been presupposed to”.

He added: “Any evaluation that tells you it was one thing in any other case is speculating with different motives.” He characterised the leak as “fully false”.

Rubio additionally solid doubt on the leaked report’s credibility, suggesting the contents had been distorted within the media and labelling the leakers as “skilled stabbers”.

Reuters U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth speaks next to U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio with U.S. President Donald TrumpReuters

Donald Trump was flanked by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth

The preliminary evaluation additionally indicated that a few of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile had been moved previous to the assault.

In response to sources aware of it, Iran’s centrifuges stay largely “intact” with the destruction restricted to aboveground buildings.

Entrances to 2 nuclear amenities had been blocked and a few infrastructure was broken, they mentioned, however a lot of the deeper installations survived the blasts.

In US intelligence terminology, “low confidence” sometimes signifies that the data is both poorly sourced, fragmented, or unsure – making it much less dependable than assessments graded with “average” or “excessive confidence”.

Hegseth’s reference to the report being “low confidence” recommend it’s tentative and its findings could change as extra element emerges.

The US struck three nuclear websites in Iran on Saturday – Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan – utilizing “bunker buster” bombs designed to penetrate hardened underground targets.

Whereas the precise munitions used within the assault haven’t been confirmed, the 30,000lb (14,000kg) Large Ordnance Penetrator (MOP), was considered the one weapon able to destroying Iran’s underground enrichment amenities.

Tehran has all the time mentioned its nuclear programme is for peaceable functions.

Satellite image (c) 2025 Maxar Technologies via Getty Images Maxar Satellite Imagery shows the ridge above the Fordo complex post-strike. Multiple impact craters and a wide grey-blue ash layer are visible across the ridge, suggesting direct hits to the overburden covering the underground facility. Satellite tv for pc picture (c) 2025 Maxar Applied sciences by way of Getty Pictures

Satellite tv for pc photos after the US assault present massive craters seen on the Fordo nuclear web site in Iran

Within the hours that adopted Saturday’s strikes, Gen Dan Caine, chairman of the joint chiefs of workers, informed reporters that it might take time to evaluate the harm to the amenities.

However he added that “all three websites sustained extraordinarily extreme harm and destruction”. Satellite tv for pc photos confirmed six recent craters clustered round two entry factors on the Fordo nuclear websites, in addition to gray mud and particles.

It’s unclear from the most recent satellite tv for pc photos, nevertheless, how a lot harm the websites sustained beneath the floor.

Hassan Abedini, the deputy political director of Iran’s state broadcaster, mentioned the three websites focused by the US had been evacuated a “whereas in the past”, and that Iran “did not undergo a serious blow as a result of the supplies had already been taken out”.

Each US and Israeli officers, in the meantime, have hailed the mission as a hit.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *